Jump to content

Rihanna


kirsch

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 934
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

She has somehow losing weight, though: her face look a bit more naturally slimmer now (instead just looking like this then, because of a combo of makeup and light/hairdo effects) , while her midriff, hips then legs have all noticeably trimmed down a little.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just to prove my point, here a few comparisons between her and a few celebrities with roughly the same proportions:

- (first picture above) -- left, Rihanna at the end of her low twenties (early 2010s) - 34-24-36, 34B cup, 134 lbs (dress size 6). This is during this period she started to consistently build up both her lean body mass whille putting a moderable amount of flesh: so that she could get a curvier figure out of her formely [34-24-34] 13-pounds-trimmer built while avoiding to flesh out from the midriff because if people noticed well, her body tend to expand more easily from the waist and abdomen... she was likely prone to develop an Apple or Big Skittle frame if she didn't worked out ; right, Jessica Paré - 1.73m/5ft 8 tall, 132 lbs, 35-26-35 (dress size 6) ;

- (second to fifth pictures above) -- left, Rihanna at her heaviest weight while the Grammies Ceremony four months earlier (maybe at a whereabout 198 ~ 205 lbs and spurting a size-16 corseted dress. Probably outsize her usual B size to a 38C) ; right, Tess Henstra at her slimmest - 1.78m/5ft 10 tall, 42-35-48, 40C cup (maybe weighing a ballpark 211 lbs) . Comparing their similar signs of overweight and proportions coupled by her dress, I hypothetize that Rihanna's measurements were hovering around 41-34-48 at this moment ; 

- (last picture) -- left, Rihanna now after have reverted back to a "fit" shape ; right, an younger Christina Hendricks performing her iconic role in Mad Men - 1.71m/5ft 7,5 tall, 38DDD (in early 2010s: probably bigger now) , 161 lbs  (then) . Rihanna doesn't seem to have reverted back to her body weight from last year ago (165lbs) as she still retain few markedly noticeable signs of a heavier frame like her C sized breasts, rounder hindquarters and somewhat lesser-defined waist, so I suppose she shed less 20lbs in fat while gaining one of fourth of the same losing weight in extra muscle mass (which meant she actually weigh 135lbs in lean mass does only, guys...) , so she's might been now considered as "fit" in clinical terms, instead hovering into early obesity like this last semester. So she probably weigh around 180 lbs now.

IMG_20180524_173158.jpg

IMG_20180524_173248.jpg

IMG_20180524_173353.jpg

IMG_20180524_173416.jpg

IMG_20180524_173647.jpg

IMG_20180524_173705.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Extracted from an interview within the "Ocean's 8" main cast on the set of the British Graham Norton Show 

You can notice that her weight-issued bounceback through the overweight lane get noticeably more obvious and I'm not speaking about the fact she keep to contour her facial features again: her collarbone has dampened in definition, her upper arms has swollen in width and jiggle a little when she raise her arms, her bust look fuller... three physical features (alongside her baby cheeks and lesser-defined jawline) the last time she flaunted was during her peak weight from this last winter.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.