Jump to content

swifty644

Members
  • Posts

    122
  • Joined

  • Last visited

3 Followers

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling

Recent Profile Visitors

1,189 profile views

swifty644's Achievements

  1. There's always going to be comparisons if models are putting themselves out there in the same video (as a point of discussion), you can't police people like that...
  2. Feels wrong? You know what feels wrong, expecting people to pay $40 for a video with virtually no preview... wrong! I challenge you to go buy something you haven't seen a glimpse of. I agree that sharing the actual video would be too far, but screenshots? Come on dude, be real here.
  3. "Screenshots don’t bother me" On the last page for your viewing pleasure.
  4. The Only Fans business model is flawed. You're expected to pay, what, $16 for content with no preview of what that content actually is? Platforms like Manyvids and Clips4Sale (hell, even Curvage) let you see a sneak preview of what you can get before your put your money down. That's a solid business model. And then you see all the disappointment in this thread from people who, if I'm honest, weren't given the tools to make a well informed purchase decision and didn't want to be subjected to paying an additional $20 for more content (after already paying a subscription fee). Also, those screenshots (not videos, just screenshots remember!) have more than likely driven sales to that Only Fans page and you damn well know it. Anyone with some Marketing prowess would see the light of that. Anyway, what tf is this thread doing on any forum other than Premium Paysite Promotions if all this thread is 'oh she updated her Only Fans' and then nothing else?
  5. I can understand where you're coming from but conversely, subscribers sticking around have the potential to enable the current style of content. I've cancelled my subscription and will return only when I hear confirmation of better and longer videos.
  6. In my humble opinion, it is not worth the subscription just yet. Most of the content is really short and a far cry from the amateur videos she made years ago.
  7. Unfortunately I don't think this is immediately obvious enough to new or existing users. New user A could think body models are models who show their whole figure, where new user B may think body models are 3D art generated with software. I think 'anonymous' is the most obvious language without dehumanizing the content in the way that 'faceless' does.
  8. Although this seems like a good idea on the surface, you will: a) Have new users who don't understand this and will post threads in the wrong place (though, it would be the right place in their head i.e. pictures in the picture forum) b) Segregate content that can change over time. For example, Goodgirlgrow as an example of someone who was anonymous and then changed their content over time. This prevents thread duplication and keeps the board tighter The anonymous tag, which is only applied when the model is anonymous, seems like the best solution moving forward. I'm going to take a stab and say retrofitting tags will not be an option (unless all thread owners did this, which I would not expect them to).
  9. When creating a thread on picture/video forums (with exception the models, celebs, requests etc), there would be a mandatory field where you tick/untick a box to state this before posting. These threads would then have a mandatory tag that appears first ('Anonymous') only when the anonymous box is ticked (see image). I do a bit of UX in my job and I know that this would improve site navigation for users massively. I also agree with the above posters suggestion of using 'Anonymous' instead of 'Faceless' to be a little more human.
  10. Would you ever consider remaking that bikini video with Shar after quarantine ends? You guys have come a long way since then, it would be an awesome remake.
  11. I have found myself visiting new threads on this forum, only to click off because I simply cannot indulge myself in content where the model's face is not on show. I don't think it's just me. We should have a system in place where you can see before clicking whether the content is featuring a model which is faceless or not. FYI I completely understand why some models are faceless and fully support a decision to remain anonymous. However, it is not content that appeals to me (and a lot others I would presume) and therefore would like a system in place to make this forum more enjoyable to navigate.
  12. swifty644

    Is this C.Bing ?

    Nope, this is Athena Blaze.
  • Recent Forum Images

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.